Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio Usoris:Muke" differant
→Declinatio adiectivi "dives": nova pars
→Declinatio adiectivi "dives": nova pars |
|||
Linea 281:
Okay, I didn't know there are patterns created without a formula, too. I'll try and create the pattern for "volo". If it goes well, I'll do "malo" and "nolo", too. Thanks! --[[Usor:Abmf|Abmf]] 14:27, 13 Augusti 2008 (UTC)
== Declinatio adiectivi "dives" ==
Salve, Mycā!
I saw you changed the declension table of dives, treating it as an i-stem adjective without forms for n. nom., acc. and voc. pl. Are you really sure this is correct? I've googled "declension dives" and I got these two full declension tables from, as I think, quite reliable sources:
*[http://www.vox-latina-gottingensis.de/grammatik/formen/adjkonsa.htm#dives]
*[http://humanum.arts.cuhk.edu.hk/~lha/latin_lessons/declension/adj_3c.php?keyword=dives&english=rich&stem=divit]
Besides, I learned that the five adjectives "vetus", "dives", "pauper", "princeps" and "particeps" are exceptions because they take all endings from the third declension consonant stems. Do you have any source that lists a gen. pl. "divitium"? Thanks in advance for your answer! --[[Usor:Abmf|Abmf]] 15:05, 28 Augusti 2008 (UTC)
| |||