Victionarium:Taberna
Haec est taberna Victionarii ubi potes si dubia habes, explanationes quaerere, nuntia ad nos mittere et cetera. Ut sententias antiquiores legas vide tabernae acta priora.
|
Quaestio nova |
|
2018 renewal of administrator status for User:YaganZ
[+/-]Hello to all contributors to Victionarium. Thank you for keeping our project alive.
These days my 1-year temporary sysop status is about to expire and I'm going to ask for a renewal.
I'm still the sole administrator here, and I think, there should be at least some person to keep an eye on this project regularly. This will help to block vandalism and SPAM immediately by local intervention.
In addition to my contributions as a normal user, there's a lot of maintenance to be done. For this purpose sysop rights are very helpful, for it's occasionally necessary to update imported scripts, to delete pages or to modify system pages.
I'm looking forward to your proposals and objections.
Thank you and best regards
Done (log). Renewed for one more year, to expire 2019-04-20. --MarcoAurelio (disputatio) 21:57, 20 Aprilis 2018 (UTC)
Update on page issues on mobile web
[+/-]Update on page issues on mobile web
Please help translate to your language Hi everyone. The Readers web team has recently begun working on exposing issue templates on the mobile website. Currently, details about issues with page content are generally hidden on the mobile website. This leaves readers unaware of the reliability of the pages they are reading. The goal of this project is to improve awareness of particular issues within an article on the mobile web. We will do this by changing the visual styling of page issues.
So far, we have drafted a proposal on the design and implementation of the project. We were also able to run user testing on the proposed designs. The tests so far have positive results. Here is a quick summary of what we learned:
- The new treatment increases awareness of page issues among participants. This is true particularly when they are in a more evaluative/critical mode.
- Page issues make sense to readers and they understand how they work
- Readers care about page issues and consider them important
- Readers had overwhelmingly positive sentiments towards Wikipedia associated with learning about page issues
Our next step would be to start implementing these changes. We wanted to reach out to you for any concerns, thoughts, and suggestions you might have before beginning development. Please visit the project page where we have more information and mockups of how this may look. Please leave feedback on the talk page.
CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 20:58, 12 Iunii 2018 (UTC)
Temporary administrator status
[+/-]Hey. I would like to ask the community for temporary admin status to help with the interface. In internal Affairs I'm not going to climb, but only fix some JS and CSS. I am an administrator in large projects (in many). Thanks. OlegCinema (disputatio) 05:41, 2 Iulii 2018 (UTC)
- @OlegCinema: thanks for your offer to fix some Javascript and CSS. We really need someone to help us with scripts in a more sophisticated way as we can do it. Please ask for administrator access at Steward requests, then go ahead. We're looking forward to you and appreciate your support. --YaganZ (disputatio) 12:34, 2 Iulii 2018 (UTC)
- I'm grateful you trust me. So that everyone can speak, I'll make a request in a week. OlegCinema (disputatio) 12:47, 2 Iulii 2018 (UTC)
Wiktionary Cognate Dashboard
[+/-]Sorry for writing this message in English. Feel free to help translate it below.
Hello all,
A few months ago, we asked you for feedback about Cognate, the system allowing interwikilinks between Wiktionaries (on main namespace). Several community members gave some suggestions, one of them was to provide statistics about these interwikilinks.
The Wikidata team is pleased to present you the Wiktionary Cognate Dashboard, a website presenting a lot of interesting information about how Wiktionaries are connected to each others. You can find there, for example:
- the most interlinked Wiktionary entries not having a page on your Wiktionary
- the number of interlinks between each possible pair of Wiktionaries
- visualizations of the relationships between different Wiktionaries
To learn more about the tool, you can have a look at the documentation (please help us translating it in your language!). The interface of the tool itself can also be translated in other languages by using this page.
If you find a bug, please let a comment on this Phabricator task or ping me onwiki. Thanks a lot, Lea Lacroix (WMDE) 13:08, 14 Augusti 2018 (UTC)
Selection of the Tremendous Wiktionary User Group representative to the Wikimedia Summit 2019
[+/-]Dear all,
Sorry for posting this message in English and last minute notification. The Tremendous Wiktionary User Group could send one representative to the Wikimedia Summit 2019 (formerly "Wikimedia Conference"). The Wikimedia Summit is an yearly conference of all organizations affiliated to the Wikimedia Movement (including our Tremendous Wiktionary User Group). It is a great place to talk about Wiktionary needs to the chapters and other user groups that compose the Wikimedia movement.
For context, there is a short report on what happened last year. The deadline is very close to 24 hrs. The last date for registration is 17 December 2018. As a last minute effort, there is a page on meta to decide who will be the representative of the user group to the Wikimedia Summit created.
Please feel free to ask any question on the wiktionary-l mailing list or on the talk page.
For the Tremendous Wiktionary User Group, -- Balajijagadesh 05:56, 16 Decembris 2018 (UTC)
Community Wishlist 2020
[+/-]The 2020 Community Wishlist Survey is now open! This survey is the process where communities decide what the Community Tech team should work on over the next year. We encourage everyone to submit proposals until the deadline on November 11, 2019, or comment on other proposals to help make them better.
This year, we’re exclusively focusing on smaller projects (i.e., Wikibooks, Wiktionary, Wikiquote, Wikisource, Wikiversity, Wikispecies, Wikivoyage, and Wikinews). We want to help these projects and provide meaningful improvements to diverse communities. If you’re a member of any of these projects, please participate in the survey! To submit proposals, see the guidelines on the survey page. You can write proposals in any language, and we will translate them for you. Thank you, and we look forward to seeing your proposals!
IFried (WMF) 19:30, 4 Novembris 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Folklore
[+/-]Hello Folks,
Wiki Loves Love is back again in 2020 iteration as Wiki Loves Folklore from 1 February, 2020 - 29 February, 2020. Join us to celebrate the local cultural heritage of your region with the theme of folklore in the international photography contest at Wikimedia Commons. Images, videos and audios representing different forms of folk cultures and new forms of heritage that haven’t otherwise been documented so far are welcome submissions in Wiki Loves Folklore. Learn more about the contest at Meta-Wiki and Commons.
Kind regards,
Wiki Loves Folklore International Team
— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk)
sent using MediaWiki message delivery (disputatio) 06:14, 18 Ianuarii 2020 (UTC)
Wiktionary sitelinks dashboard: URL update
[+/-]Hello all, and sorry for writing in English. Feel free to translate this message below.
The Wiktionary Cognate Dashboard presents interesting data about the extension powering your sitelinks. I just wanted to let you know that the URL of this tool changed: it is now accessible at https://wiktionary-analytics.wmcloud.org/Wiktionary_CognateDashboard/ . The former URLs, https://wmdeanalytics.wmflabs.org/Wiktionary_CognateDashboard/ and https://wdcm.wmflabs.org/Wiktionary_CognateDashboard/ , will be disabled on September 25th. Don't forget to update your documentation pages accordingly.
If you have questions about the tool or the URL switch, feel free to ping me. Cheers, Lea Lacroix (WMDE) 11:46, 14 Septembris 2020 (UTC)
Global bot policy proposal: invitation to a Meta discussion
[+/-]Hello!
I apologize for sending a message in English. Please help translate to your language. According to the list, your wiki project currently is opted in to the global bot policy. Under this policy, bots that fix double redirects or maintain interwiki links are allowed to operate under a global bot flag that is assigned directly by the stewards.
As the Wikimedia projects developed, the need for the current global bot policy decreased, and in the past years, no bots were appointed via that policy. That is mainly given Wikidata were estabilished in 2013, and it is no longer necessary to have dozens of bots that maintain interwiki links.
A proposal was made at Meta-Wiki, which proposes that the stewards will be authorized to determine whether an uncontroversial task may be assigned a global bot flag. The stewards already assign permissions that are more impactful on many wikis, namely, global sysops and global renamers, and I do not think that trust should be an issue. The stewards will assign the permission only to time-proven bots that are already approved at a number of projects, like ListeriaBot.
By this message, I would like to invite you to comment in the global RFC, to voice your opinion about this matter.
Thank you for your time.
Best regards,
Martin Urbanec (disputatio) 11:49, 24 Novembris 2020 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 is back!
[+/-]Please help translate to your language
You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.
You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.
Please support us in translating the project page and a banner message to help us spread the word in your native language.
Kind regards,
Wiki loves Folklore International Team
MediaWiki message delivery (disputatio) 13:25, 6 Februarii 2021 (UTC)
Proposal: Set two-letter project shortcuts as alias to project namespace globally
[+/-]Please help translate to your language
Hello everyone,
I apologize for posting in English. I would like to inform everyone that I created a new global request for comment (GRFC) at Meta Wiki, which may affect your project: m:Requests for comment/Set short project namespace aliases by default globally.
In this GRFC, I propose that two-project shortcuts for project names will become a default alias for the project namespace. For instance, on all Wikipedias, WP will be an alias to the Wikipedia: namespace (and similar for other projects). Full list is available in the GRFC.
This is already the case for Wikivoyages, and many individual projects asked for this alias to be implemented. I believe this makes it easier to access the materials in the project namespace, as well as creating shortcuts like WP:NPOV, as well as helps new projects to use this feature, without having to figure out how to request site configuration changes first.
As far as I can see, Victionarium currently does not have such an alias set. This means that such an alias will be set for you, if the GRFC is accepted by the global community.
I would like to ask all community members to participate in the request for comment at Meta-Wiki, see m:Requests for comment/Set short project namespace aliases by default globally.
Please feel free to ask me if you have any questions about this proposal.
Best regards,
--Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:12, 18 Februarii 2021 (UTC)
Global bot policy changes
[+/-]Hello!
I apologize for sending a message in English. Please help translate to your language. According to the list, your wiki project is currently opted in to the global bot policy. As such, I want to let you know about some changes that were made after the global RfC was closed.
- Global bots are now subject to a 2 week discussion, and it'll be publicized via a MassMessage list, available at Bot policy/New global bot discussion on Meta. Please subscribe yourself or your wiki if you are interested in new global bots proposals.
- For a bot to be considered for approval, it must demonstrate it is welcomed in multiple projects, and a good way to do that is to have the bot flag on at least 5 wikis for a single task.
- The bot operator should make sure to adhere to the wiki's preference as related to the use of the bot flag (i.e., if a wiki doesn't want a bot to use the flag as it edits, that should be followed).
Thank you for your time.
Best regards,
—Thanks for the fish! talk•contribs 18:48, 6 Aprilis 2021 (UTC)
Wikimania 2021: Individual Program Submissions
[+/-]Dear all,
Wikimania 2021 will be hosted virtually for the first time in the event's 15-year history. Since there is no in-person host, the event is being organized by a diverse group of Wikimedia volunteers that form the Core Organizing Team (COT) for Wikimania 2021.
Event Program - Individuals or a group of individuals can submit their session proposals to be a part of the program. There will be translation support for sessions provided in a number of languages. See more information here.
Below are some links to guide you through;
Please note that the deadline for submission is 18th June 2021.
Announcements- To keep up to date with the developments around Wikimania, the COT sends out weekly updates. You can view them in the Announcement section here.
Office Hour - If you are left with questions, the COT will be hosting some office hours (in multiple languages), in multiple time-zones, to answer any programming questions that you might have. Details can be found here.
Best regards,
MediaWiki message delivery (disputatio) 04:19, 16 Iunii 2021 (UTC)
On behalf of Wikimania 2021 Core Organizing Team
Editing news 2021 #2
[+/-]Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.
The key results were:
- Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
- The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.
These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.
Looking ahead
The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.
The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.
You can turn on "Discussion tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.
14:15, 24 Iunii 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Folklore is back!
[+/-]Please help translate to your language
You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.
You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.
You can also organize a local contest in your country and support us in translating the project pages to help us spread the word in your native language.
Feel free to contact us on our project Talk page if you need any assistance.
Kind regards,
Wiki loves Folklore International Team
--MediaWiki message delivery (disputatio) 13:15, 9 Ianuarii 2022 (UTC)
Subscribe to the This Month in Education newsletter - learn from others and share your stories
[+/-]Dear community members,
Greetings from the EWOC Newsletter team and the education team at Wikimedia Foundation. We are very excited to share that we on tenth years of Education Newsletter (This Month in Education) invite you to join us by subscribing to the newsletter on your talk page or by sharing your activities in the upcoming newsletters. The Wikimedia Education newsletter is a monthly newsletter that collects articles written by community members using Wikimedia projects in education around the world, and it is published by the EWOC Newsletter team in collaboration with the Education team. These stories can bring you new ideas to try, valuable insights about the success and challenges of our community members in running education programs in their context.
If your affiliate/language project is developing its own education initiatives, please remember to take advantage of this newsletter to publish your stories with the wider movement that shares your passion for education. You can submit newsletter articles in your own language or submit bilingual articles for the education newsletter. For the month of January the deadline to submit articles is on the 20th January. We look forward to reading your stories.
Older versions of this newsletter can be found in the complete archive.
More information about the newsletter can be found at Education/Newsletter/About.
For more information, please contact spatnaikFormula:@wikimedia.org.
Editing news 2022 #1
[+/-]Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
The New topic tool helps editors create new ==Sections== on discussion pages. New editors are more successful with this new tool. You can read the report. Soon, the Editing team will offer this to all editors at the 20 Wikipedias that participated in the test. You will be able to turn it off at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.
Whatamidoing (WMF) 18:55, 2 Maii 2022 (UTC)
Quā fōrmulā ad trānslātiōnēs ūtī?
[+/-]Salvēte, omnēs.
Victionarium:Exemplum dē quā fōrmulā ad trānslātiōnēs ūtī nōn clārum est quod {{t}} sub modō praesente stat, dum {{x}} dicta est ut optima. Quā fōrmulā ūtī dēbēmus?
Grātiās vōbīs agō prō auxiliō.
Lutrasapiens (disputatio) 20:41, 20 Iunii 2022 (UTC)
- Salve Lutrasapiens, pro paginis novis, translationum formulae {{trans-tab}} et {{t+}} cum notis velut {{en}}, {{fur}}, {{grc}}, {{sl}} etc. uti praeferendae sunt. Novissima sunt exempla sub modo praesente. Gratias ago, --YaganZ (disputatio) 16:53, 21 Iunii 2022 (UTC)
- Ūtilene omnēs pāginās veterēs cum
{{trans-tab}}
et cēterīs renovāre? - Lutrasapiens (disputatio) 10:27, 10 Novembris 2022 (UTC)
- Salve Lutrasapiens, paginarum antiquarum (veterum) renovatio valde desiderabilis utilisque est, praesertim sectionis translationum, ut opinor. Hoc subinde facio, sed magnum opus est. Si iuvare velis, perge quaeso! -- YaganZ (disputatio) 15:06, 10 Novembris 2022 (UTC)
- Ūtilene omnēs pāginās veterēs cum
lemmata Latina
[+/-]"iacio" non apparet apud lemmata Latina? Alex1011 (disputatio) 19:24, 2 Ianuarii 2023 (UTC)
- Salve Alex, "iacio" nunc est in categoria "Vocabulorum lemmata Latina". --YaganZ (disputatio) 20:08, 2 Ianuarii 2023 (UTC)
"plaudeo"
[+/-]per errorem meum "plaudeo" est delendum. Alex1011 (disputatio) 21:01, 2 Ianuarii 2023 (UTC)
Global ban for PlanespotterA320/RespectCE
[+/-]Per the Global bans policy, I'm informing the project of this request for comment: m:Requests for comment/Global ban for PlanespotterA320 (2) about banning a member from your community. Thank you.--Lemonaka (talk) 21:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Editing news 2023 #1
[+/-]Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
This newsletter includes two key updates about the Editing team's work:
- The Editing team will finish adding new features to the Talk pages project and deploy it.
- They are beginning a new project, Edit check.
Talk pages project
The Editing team is nearly finished with this first phase of the Talk pages project. Nearly all new features are available now in the Beta Feature for Discussion tools.
It will show information about how active a discussion is, such as the date of the most recent comment. There will soon be a new "Partem novam addere" button. You will be able to turn them off at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion. Please tell them what you think.
An A/B test for Discussion tools on the mobile site has finished. Editors were more successful with Discussion tools. The Editing team is enabling these features for all editors on the mobile site.
New Project: Edit Check
The Editing team is beginning a project to help new editors of Wikipedia. It will help people identify some problems before they click "Hanc recensionem divulgare". The first tool will encourage people to add references when they add new content. Please watch that page for more information. You can join a conference call on 3 March 2023 to learn more.
–Whatamidoing (WMF) (disputatio) 23:25, 22 Februarii 2023 (UTC)
de proverbiis multorum verborum
[+/-]adestne modus ostendendi proverbia multorum verborum?
Exemplum: 'Medium Sociale' (https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_socialia) vel 'Situs interretialis'. Scio possibile esse apud Victionarium Anglicum (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/situs_interretialis), sed ignoro hic. Nescio sententias moderatorum hic, sed credo utile futurus esse. Illascaphaquamvidisti (disputatio) 18:39, 10 Decembris 2023 (UTC)
- @Illascaphaquamvidisti: I'll try to answer your question in English:
- There are a few categorized examples of what you call "proverbia multorum verborum" in Categoria:Elementa linguistica, containing a few proverbia and locutiones. There are some more or less categorized examples, like dies Solis etc.
- You may handle 'situs interetialis' in a similar way, but please take into account that this is a Latin dictionary, and all entries should have an explanation of the meaning in Latin language. To prove or demonstrate the relevance of an entry (especially when it's a neologism), I would recommend to provide at least one text example (or a link to) as a reference, where the entry appears in some Latin context. This could be done in the sections ‘Usus’ or ‘Loci’ and ‘Fontes’. --YaganZ (disputatio) 20:00, 22 Decembris 2023 (UTC)
សាយ វាសនា 119.13.62.5 18:31, 28 Decembris 2023 (UTC)