Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio Auxilii:Lingua Quechua" differant
Content deleted Content added
Nova pagina: No, I don't think "Quechuus" is an adjective like that. Even Spanish doesn't treat it that way. Probably the more normal way would be google:Quechuanus. But, if you could show a ... |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Linea 1: | Linea 1: | ||
No, I don't think "Quechuus" is an adjective like that. Even Spanish doesn't treat it that way. Probably the more normal way would be [[google:Quechuanus|Quechuanus]]. But, if you could show a source, that would be great. —[[Usor:Mycēs|Mucius <span style="font-variant:small-caps">Tever</span>]] 18:37, 24 Novembris 2007 (UTC) |
No, I don't think "Quechuus" is an adjective like that. Even Spanish doesn't treat it that way. Probably the more normal way would be [[google:Quechuanus|Quechuanus]]. But, if you could show a source, that would be great. —[[Usor:Mycēs|Mucius <span style="font-variant:small-caps">Tever</span>]] 18:37, 24 Novembris 2007 (UTC) |
||
:Neither do I, but I write like that just in case.--[[User:Le K-li|Le K-li]] 01:37, 25 Novembris 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Redactio novissime (die 25 Novembris 2007, hora 01:37) facta
No, I don't think "Quechuus" is an adjective like that. Even Spanish doesn't treat it that way. Probably the more normal way would be Quechuanus. But, if you could show a source, that would be great. —Mucius Tever 18:37, 24 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
- Neither do I, but I write like that just in case.--Le K-li 01:37, 25 Novembris 2007 (UTC)